There
are many different research methods available to use to aid in investigating
various topics. For example, a group of
researchers could use experiments in a controlled environment to collect data
on a particular subject or conduct individualized interviews to gather more in
depth information about said subject.
Another tactic available to researchers is a poll of a target sample or
a survey of some sorts. This allows
researchers to hit a wider sample of a demographic with the same material, even
if that data isn’t quite as detailed as it would be if it were gathered through
other methods.
Experimentation
on a group is often used for testing a particular situation on the group while
also checking their results against a ‘control group’. This control group wouldn’t be subjected to
the conditions and would be in a generic set of opposing conditions. This presents a set of data to the
researchers that can be used as a reference point for the actual test
subjects. For example, one such
experiment may be human trials of a new drug.
This drug has already passed various other tests and now needs to be
tested on humans in a controlled set of conditions to determine if it is safe
to distribute to the general population.
Participants are selected to fit the conditions the best and they may be
split into several groups to test different conditions of the same
experiment. The ‘control group’ of this
experiment may be given a placebo such as sugar pills. This group wouldn’t be told that they don’t
have the product and their mentality would be the same as those taking the
drug. This would allow the researchers
to eliminate any psychosomatic (self-induced) effects of the drug. This type of method is useful to test
specific conditions of a situation.
Another
method of research is the use of a poll or a survey. Polls are typically shorter than surveys and
(in modern days) often take a very limited amount of time to complete and
usually consist of clicking a button and pressing submit. Surveys are more in depth and allow
researchers to gather better data on a series of questions. For my IMRaD paper on the factors that may
influence cheating for ENGL 105-01, this is the method I used. I typed up a survey that would analyze the
various aspects of cheating in academics and the influence of grading on such
inclinations and eventually culminated in the overall question of “Will the
abolishment of grades result in the declination of cheating?”
Since
surveys are often biased and allow the test takers a certain amount of freedom
to answer honestly (or dishonestly as the nature of human beings may be),
interviews can help to fix the skewed data and to also gather even more in
depth data on a subject. These are often
recorded to allow the interviewers the chance to review the tape and analyze it
further. These records also eliminate
the need to write down the interviewee’s responses (which can often convey a
sense of judgment to the interviewee).
All of
these methods are a valid way of collecting data, but each one is useful in its
own way. Experiments are useful for
testing certain situations and gathering data from the reactions of the
subjects. Surveys are better used to
gather the opinions of a large sample (from which the data can be analyzed and
interpreted). And interviews focus on
the individual, focusing more on quality of the data rather than the quantity
of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment